History paper 1 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

History paper 1 - Essay Example Of course, the journey was possible because the proclamation line of 1763 was a law that proved difficult to enforce when most colonialists questioned why their movements would be impeded. The spirit of revolution came with the expansion to the west which offered some of the most productive lands (Tocqueville 31). My father wanted a rich and bigger farmland given that we were family of seven children. He also wanted to change the way he made a living. Journeying westwards was the answer to his prayers since he wanted to settle us comfortably in a new and cheaper land. In addition, my rich uncle, Benjamin Woodruff, had migrated to the West before, making it easier for my father to learn of his journey and success. My uncle was one of the firm believers that building colonization schemes were helpful so that the poor people who migrated to the West would provide cheap labor. As a young 12-year-old boy, my father and three brothers left me in charge of the wagon for a short while they scouted the emigrant road to check if it was safe from thieves and hostile Indian tribes. My sisters and I piled everything that we owned in the Canvas wagon and the hand carts and waited for my father and brothers to return. We used a route that stretched across the river and the short-grass prairies. Life along the trail was not as pleasant as I expected. My father had told my mother the previous day that we would have to walk at least 25 miles a day in daylight to avoid attacks from grizzly bears and other wild animals on the trail. My father and brothers all had guns. Among all the other families on the caravan, we had more guns which made or journey safer. Several months on the trail were shocking enough show me that this was not a journey for the faint hearted. Back at home, my friends had told me through letters that malaria and cholera were some of the diseases that killed people on their journey. I had always thought it was a

Organizational Culture and Innovation Essay Example for Free

Organizational Culture and Innovation Essay Organizational culture is very important in the pursuit of innovation, which is the major source of competitive advantage in the world today. Organizational culture is central to a company’s pursuit of innovation because it refers to the beliefs, values, attitudes, tradition and overall practices within and without an organization (Hill Jones, 2001). If the culture of the organization permits creative thinking and entrepreneurship, then innovation can certainly flourish. If the organizational culture, however, is very strict and adheres too much to its cherished traditions, routines and way of doing things, then innovation may be stifled and the organization will just rely on what has been tried and tested before. Such culture of adherence to past successes and ways of doing things will be inimical to the performance of the organization in the long run. As new factors, trends and issues in the market appear, the organization should continue to innovate and seek for ways to deliver better products and services that their clients will patronize. An innovative organization will always learn how to make best use of trends and emerging factors in its environment. There are several elements of organizational culture that can either encourage or hinder the pursuit of innovation (Johnson, 1988). The paradigm or the statement of vision and mission of the organization defines what it is all about and from there all activities in the organization are derived. There are also processes, structures and policies in place in the organization. These formal structures can enable innovation in the organization if it is not stringent and strict enough to stifle innovations. The power structures and the character of decision makers can encourage innovation. If there is openness in the leadership, this will trickle down to the grassroots level of the organization and will provide a rich backdrop where innovation can be cultivated. On the other hand, a leadership that puts a premium on seniority and too much authority fosters an adherence to established rules of conduct within the organization. In such a case, the pursuit of innovation may even be looked down as an act of insubordination. The symbols valued by the organization are also important in stimulating innovation and change. Is change and innovation valued in the organization? Are efforts to this end recognized and valued? This is also further exemplified by the rituals and routines in the organization. As innovation becomes praised and recognized throughout the organization, the members of the organization will be motivated to pursue innovation. As the formal structures encourage and praise innovation, so will it extend to the informal stories and myths of the organization. This way, ordinary employees and people at the bottom level of the organizational hierarchy will talk about the importance of innovation in the organization. Organizational culture can work for the pursuit of innovation in any given company or corporation. Organizations should deliberately work for the integration of innovation awareness in all levels. When this happens, the organization will become entrepreneurial, always looking out for means to improve and excel on their chosen niche in the market. With innovation, the organization can continue with its usual activities and it can even expand its operations to other areas where it can perform best. An organizational culture that fosters innovation is a must in this highly competitive world.

The rhyme scheme of Sonnet 65

The rhyme scheme of Sonnet 65 In Sonnet 65, Shakespeare shows us very little hope that beauty will be able to endure the forces of time and mortality.   By the end of the poem, the author explains that the only place beauty will be immortalized is in his writing.   In making his point, it appears Shakespeare merely poses several emotionally driven, rhetorical questions, however these questions are logically coherent.   By the poems end, these questions lead the speaker and reader to an acceptable solution for the preservation of beauty. The rhyme scheme of this poem (ABAB CDCD EFEF GG) separates the fourteen-line sonnet into three quartets and one final couplet.   By posing seven consecutive questions without any solution, the author creates a grave sense of despair.   Not until the couplet is the reader exposed to a shimmer of hope.   Each cluster of lines, utilizing different sentence structure, fits into the logical progression of the poem.   In the first quartet, which is the first sentence as well, the speaker asks us to consider how well beauty will be able to fair against mortality.   If stone, earth, sea, and brass all fall victim to mortality, how then will beauty be able to last?   He uses legal terms like hold a plea, which in modern English changes to the term make a case.   When contemplating his second question, the speaker changes from metaphors based on legal images to metaphors of war and belligerence.   Time is presented as a wreckful siege of battering days.   Once again, the despair is heightened because of the hopeless situation into which beauty is placed.   The speaker asks if rocks and gates of steel cannot withstand time, will beauty be able to last?   Adding to the despair of Sonnet 65, in these first two quartets, Shakespeare presents beauty as a delicate and meek object, and contrasts it with fiercer imagery.   Beauty, represented as a flower and summers honey-breath, is positioned within the same sentence as a boundless sea, gates of steel, and rocks impregnable, among others. When moving from the first to the second question, Shakespeare flips the sentence structure.   In sentence one, the objects beauty is being compared with (earth, stone, etc.) are placed first, then the force that will destroy beauty (mortality) is noted, followed by the sentence kernel (beauty hold a plea), and finally the sentence kernels modifiers.   In the second question, the kernel is placed first (summers honey-breath hold out), followed by a metaphor for time (wreckful siege), then the forces beauty is being compared with, and finally the ruinous force (time) is noted.   Up to now, the speaker has used the entire quartet to pose a single question.   In the final quartet, three questions will be asked within the space of four lines.   Shakespeare begins the final quartet with an interjection, O fearful meditation! (such scary thoughts), referring to the outrageous opposition beauty must face, as mentioned in the first two quartets.   He has posed two questions thus far, and has offered no insight on answering them.   Another three rhetorical questions, logically interlocked with the preceding eight lines, are asked in this final quartet.   These questions are designed to deepen the tone of despair until we are given any definite solution in the final couplet. The first question Shakespeare presents is, . . . where, alack, Shall Times best jewel from Times chest lie hid?   The immediately striking wording in this clause is Times best jewel.   Literally, the most outstanding creation that has ever existed is beauty.   Time and beauty, especially in the second quartet, have been suggested to be opposing forces.   Time, thus far in the sonnet, is the force that is trying to ruin beauty.   Now we see that time is the very force that is responsible for the creation and destruction of beauty; beauty exists because of and within times power. Shakespeare chose chest as the speaker tries to determine where beauty will finally find safety.   Throughout this sonnet, and especially in this quartet, words with multiple denotations are used to increase the complexity of the poem.   Chest, on one level, can refer to the chest of a human being.   (We have already seen time personified with pronouns like his, and on line 11, time is given a human appendage: a foot.)   Shakespeare means that beauty will finally reach safety when it is wrapped in times arm and nestled in his chest.   Chest, on another level, can be interpreted as a box where items of reverence can be stored in safekeeping.   Moving on logically with the idea of mortality and death in the first quartet, a chest is the coffin that beauty is seeking to avoid. Another question Shakespeare poses in this quartet is, Or who his spoil of beauty can forbid?   Once again, the author is personifying the concept of time by using the pronoun his.   The most literal meaning of this question is along the lines of: who will be able to prevalent the destruction of beauty?   However, spoil has two other meanings that relate to the context of Sonnet 65.   The first plays on the war metaphor in the second quartet.   The spoils of war refer to objects seized in battle.    In the second quartet, time was described in terms of a wreckful siege.   Shakespeare has already asserted that time and beauty quarrel.   Now, unless someone or some force intervenes, beauty will be lost like treasure that has been seized in battle.   Moreover, spoil can refer to a plot of land that has become unserviceable in some way.   Metaphorically, beauty has been compared to a delicate flower and the honey-breath of summer, which is the sweet smell of blossoming flowers.   If the ground is ruined, flowers, or beauty, cannot flourish. The remaining question Shakespeare asks in this quartet is, Or what strong hand can hold his swift foot back?   Two key phrases should be examined in this line.   The first is his swift foot.   In acquiring a human foot, time is further personified.   More importantly, he is saying that time is swift moving.   The image of the foot here creates an image of a running person.    Either the speaker is fearful that time, as it runs, will trample and destroy this beauty, or that time, passing by very quickly, will overlook beauty and forget it.   In the other important phrase, the speaker is searching for a strong hand that can hold back the foot (of time).   On a most literal level, the strong hand is the image of a human hand capable of restraining the foot that is about to kick or trample beauty.   On another level, he can be looking to his writing hand as the hand that allows beauty to endure.   In either case, he is desperately searching for a way to avoid devastation. In the final rhymed couplet, the speaker discloses the solution on how beauty can be preserved.   Shakespeare knows that beauty cannot survive forever as a living being or as an idea in his head.   The only way it can endure is through his writing, therefore he claims, O, none unless this miracle have might, That in black ink my love will still shine bright.   Nothing can prevent the ruination of beauty but this poem.   First, Shakespeare affirms the notion on line 11 that the hand capable to hold back the swift foot of time will in fact be his writing hand.   Beauty will last in the black ink he uses to jot this verse.   All other preceding questions have been answered.   Placing himself at the level of God, Shakespeare asserts that he has a power that ranges over divine forces like time and mortality.   And no one has the ability to preserve beauty like he. There is uncertainty as to whether beauty refers to a specific person, or to the feeling of being in love.   I believe, with a poem as emotionally driven as this, and by comparing beauty to the scent of summer (the feeling of a summer fling), Shakespeare is speaking not about an individual, but about being in love.   However, there will always be much debate on this topic.      Shakespeare poses several emotionally driven, rhetorical questions, however these questions are logically coherent.   By posing seven consecutive questions without any solution, the author creates a grave sense of despair.  Despair is heightened because of the hopeless situation into which beauty is placed.   Time, for most of the sonnet, is the force that is trying to ruin beauty.  Shakespeare repeatedly personifies the concept of time by using the pronoun his.   But later on the reader is made aware that time is the very force that is responsible for the creation and destruction of beauty .Words with multiple denotations are used by Shakespeare to increase the complexity of the poem.   By making use of innovative literary devices, Shakespeare creates definitive meaning of beauty and time, intertwined with a sense of complete despair.

The New America Dream is Green (and Sustainable) Essay -- Localization

Smallville is a city just like any other city in the world. It has crime, pollution, and social inequalities. However citizens everywhere are dreaming of the future. The reason people came to Smallville, or America, in the first place was to live the American Dream. This idea is that if a person works hard enough they can be or achieve anything they want. However, the current system of selfishness and ignorance of the masses has led to the destruction of this idea. In order for these dreams to survive, Smallville needs to promote change. There needs to be more information about the effects people have on their communities and the environment. There needs to be a shift towards long-term sustainability. Before there can be greener technology, ecologically friendly businesses, or sustainable energy citizens need to change their outlook on life. Every individual needs to realize their role in the community. There needs to be more emphasis on people living local, eating local, an d working local. The more localization and less globalization there is the better. The more people use what is readily available to them the more they will realize how important it is not to waste. In order for communities to get a long every individual needs to be respected. There needs to be social equality between men and women, different ethnicities, and an acceptance of the LBGTQ community. Once this is achieved, the New American Dream will be born. This new idea will include being anything you want to be while helping others reach the same goal. Smallville needs to take the steps towards a more informed and aware society so people can achieve their dreams while not destroying the dreams of others around the world. In order for Smallville to r... ...rt. "Accepting the gay person: Rental accommodation in the community." Journal of Homosexuality 36.2 (1998): 31. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 25 Mar. 2014. Page explains the struggles an LBGTQ citizen has when finding a place to live freely in a community. It shows that there needs to a major acceptance of the couple or even individuals who are gay by the community in order for the person to feel welcome. People usually do not like to live where they do not feel welcome. This will help me show where major change needs to be within the social realm of society. If people cannot accept each other they cannot join as a community and eventually fix other problems that require cooperation. This article's only bias is justified because it shows real stories of people being harassed. It does not give merit to the side that says these people are really the problem.

DRUNK DRIVING Essay

Drinking and driving is a very serious and dangerous problem. Many people every year are killed or injured because of drunk drivers, and almost all of the people who are killed are innocent. The more you drink the more likely you are to have an accident. Driving whilst under the influence of drink is a dangerous situation, and the consequences are appalling, because you can end up killing someone else, losing your own life or even sent to court. Why do people drink while driving? The answer is simply cause there drunk! They are too drunk to think properly, they might have done it before and they think it’s not bad, perhaps too lazy to get a taxi, they feel confident that they can drive extra carefully and avoid incident, Their ability to rationalize is suppressed, leading them to make rash decisions, They want to escape personal problems This is probably one of the most dangerous reasons why people drink and drive. A man / woman in the thick of problems, gets drunk and gets in the car. Caught in his / her emotions, the person doesn’t care what happens anymore. Sadly, among the reasons why people drink and drive, this is a common reason; they are ashamed or afraid to call someone to pick them up. People wake up in cells not realizing they killed a person with their car. Some people drink and drive because they don’t know any better. Some people are not even aware of the legal drinking limits.

Is the World Flat?

Globalization is a big issue in our modern day. What is globalization? Has globalization passed its peak? Is the world flat or spiky? There are several very vocal proponents of an argument that the world has become flat in recent years. However, there are some writers have the opposite opinion. This paper introduces both sides of the debate and presents the arguments for and against the idea that the world has become flat in recent years. The term â€Å"globalization† today refers to the shift in the world economy. It is moving towards a more integrated and interdependent world economy (H. C. W, p. 8). Globalization makes people, countries and markets closer. The world is flat; this view is supported by some people, but the most prominent being Thomas L. Friedman. â€Å"It’s a Flat World, After All† is a journal by Friedman which was published in 2005. In this article, Friedman argues the world is â€Å"flat† as a result of globalization; it is also a product of a convergence of personal computer and fiber-optic micro cable and software. Globalization has leveled the playing fields between different countries. This is what he called Globalization 3. 0 (started around 2000) which quite different from the earlier 2. 0 and 1. 0 versions (Thomas L. Friedman, 2005). To support the â€Å"flat world†, Friedman identities ten flattening factors that he sees as leveling the global playing field. Thomas Friedman taught us that the world is flat, but is the world really flat? Richard Florida has scorned his arguments. Florida, says that the world is actually spiky. In â€Å"The World is Spiky†, published in The Atlantic Monthly in 2005, Florida argues that economic power, innovation, and creative talent is actually only clustered in a few cities and regions, so these areas are growing higher while other areas languish (Richard Florida, 2005) Florida uses a series of maps to prove his argument. He shows where the world’s population centres are and where many of the world’s patents are issued and where the most scientists are located. Florida mentions the share of the world’s population living in urban areas is over 50% world wide now compared to just 3% in 1800. Some big cities, such as New York, Los Angeles, Toronto, Vancouver, Tokyo, Shanghai, around the globe are towers of patent filings, population, and science, but some cities are not. So the ability to innovate and create is only centred among few places in the world (Richard Florida, 2005). Pankaj Ghemawat, is another writer scorns the argument for the world has become flat. He argued more than ninety percent of the world's phone calls, Web traffic, and investments are still domestic (Ghemawat, 2007). Ghemawat also suggests that Friedman’s assertions are exaggerated visions. He points out that Friedman has grossly exaggerated the significance of the trends he describes: â€Å"Despite talk of a new, wired world where information, ideas, money, and people can move around the planet faster than ever before, just a fraction of what we consider globalization actually exists (Ghemawat, 2007) The issue of if the world has become flat in recent years has divided opinion in two different sides. Proponents of an argument that the world has become flat, like Friedman, believes people are getting closer and all competitors have an equal opportunity. The opposite side, such as Florida and Ghemawat, says otherwise. They think there are peaks and valleys. The peaks are getting stronger and more connected to each other. Word Count: 613 words Bibliography Article Florida, R. 2005, ‘The world is spiky,' Atlantic Monthly (October), pp. 8-51. Friedman, T. L. 2005, ‘It’s a flat world, after all', The New York Times Magazine, April 3, pp. 33-37. Ghemawat, P. 2007, ‘Why the world isn't flat,' Foreign Policy (March-April), pp. 54-60. Hill, C and Cronk, T and Wickramasekera, R. ‘Global Business Today’, pp. 8 Internet ‘The World is Not Flat – It's Spiky’, February 26, 2006, from: http://remoteaccess. typepad. com/remote_access/2006/0 2/the_world_is_no. html ‘Is the World Flat †¦ or Spiky? ’ From: http://insidework. net/resources/articles/is-world-flat-or-spiky